MUDDI SWG

Chair(s):

Roensdorf, Carsten (Ordnance Survey)
Hughes, Andrew (United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI))
Leidner, Alan (New York City Geospatial Information System and Mapping Organization (GISMO))

Group Charter:

Download Charter document

Group Description:

Purpose of the Standards Working Group

The MUDDI (Model for Underground Data Definition and Integration) Standards Working Group will standardize a conceptual model, a modular framework, one or more logical models, one or more implementation specifications, and mappings to/from other models for geospatial data that represent underground infrastructure assets and characterize the underground environment that contains those assets. According to its name, the MUDDI approach emphasizes the definition of common concepts and terminology that mediate between elements in existing relevant data models and can be used to integrate underground data from disparate sources leveraging those models.

  • The conceptual model will provide a general basis for interoperability between multiple MUDDI implementations and encodings

  • The modular framework will support extensible model capabilities as they are needed to meet specific use cases

  • Each logical model will be consistent with the conceptual model and provide a more specific level of interoperability between two or more implementation standards and/or encodings.

  • Each implementation specification will support a specific data language and encoding, such as GML, CityGML, or SF-SQL.

  • Mappings between MUDDI and other relevant models such as LandInfra or BIM / IFC (Building Information Model / Industry Foundation Classes) will support maximum reuse of data between different domains of application and computing environments

Business Value Proposition

Every year the vast majority of seemingly routine street excavations occurring around the world are adversely impacted by lack of usable information about buried utility infrastructure. Large-scale construction projects are frequently stalled, incurring delay claims and change orders that significantly increase costs, because the locations of utility installations were never properly recorded or depicted. Bid costs may be increased by a minimum of 10-30% for contingencies to deal with buried unknowns. Lack of knowledge about underground built environment dependencies and vulnerabilities often stands in the way of effective disaster response and recovery.

These costs and risks could all be mitigated if accurate, comprehensive underground built environment information were available and shared between responsible parties for rapid integration and analysis. An essential first step towards achieving this capability involves developing geo-enabled utility data models with built-in capabilities for enabling data interoperability and integration. Development and adoption of such models would deliver significant benefits by improving data interchange, integration, and application readiness. Models should focus on those attributes most important for specific use cases such as safe digging, construction design, and disaster resilience, with the capacity for extension as needed to accommodate more complex use cases as the business value of data sharing and interoperability is established.

An additional value of developing standardized data models for selected underground utility components and environmental characteristics will be the opportunity to connect with models such as CityGML or BIM / IFC that principally address above-ground features, or GeoSciML / WaterML that cover a broad range of geologic and hydrologic phenomena. This will allow the use of standardized, interoperable data to model the entire interconnected built and natural municipal environment from top to bottom at every scale from small local jurisdictions to regional and national extents.

Scope of Work

  1. Expand, prioritize, and validate a set of use cases based on the 2017 OGC Underground Infrastructure Concept Development Study [1] and the 2018 OGC Underground Infrastructure Pilot: MUDDI Workshop [2]

  2. Update and specify a MUDDI conceptual model, based upon and with mappings to existing model standards as laid out in [2]

  3. Develop a roadmap specification that outlines a framework and mechanisms for model modularity, allowing advanced MUDDI profiles to be constructed that preserve the fundamental interoperable concepts and relationships of the model.

  4. Develop an initial logical and physical implementation specification of the core MUDDI model as a base capability and template for future model development.

  5. Determine whether the SWG should conclude its work or continue to work on additional logical and physical models and/or harmonizations with other standards.

Statement of relationship of planned work to the current OGC standards baseline

The MUDDI standard will draw from and relate to OGC Standards relevant to the built environment, such as CityGML and LandInfra. It will also leverage OGC standards modeling the natural environment such as GeoSciML, and WaterML2.

Once the SWG is established, a candidate standard will be developed within one year.

What is Out of Scope?

The SWG will only standardize a model for underground data representation, relying on OGC API’s such as [3] to facilitate distributed, fine-grained, secure interchange of such representations between distributed systems and organizations.

As the MUDDI standard will be modular and multi-part, its core and extension structure will allow a customized approach to implementing specific capabilities. If a community needs to develop a MUDDI profile specialized for its own use, that profile should be specified and governed by that community based on the MUDDI framework.

Specific Existing Work Used as Starting Point

The SWG work will be based on:

  1. The 2017 OGC Underground Infrastructure Concept Study (CDS) [1] and references therein. This study included:

    • A compilation of information on the state of underground infrastructure information and supporting systems. Sponsors included the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), and the Center for Geospatial Innovation for the Fund for the City of New York.

    • An issued RFI (request for information) that sought input from companies, jurisdictions, and nations around the world about current information challenges and how to solve them. Twenty-nine organizations responded to the RFI and delivered extremely valuable information that was summarized in the CDS report.

    • Organization of a workshop at the offices of the Fund for the City of New York, which brought together selected RFI responders for a two-day conference that explored the challenges and options associated with developing standardized infrastructure information, also summarized in the CDS report.

    • Delineation of 6 core use cases for underground information:

      • Routine street excavations;

      • Emergency response;

      • Utility maintenance programs;

      • Large scale construction projects;

      • Disaster planning and response; and

      • Smart cities programs.

  2. MUDDI Model for Underground Data Definition and Integration Engineering Report [2] and references. This engineering report was derived from a workshop held in July 2018 to further develop requirements for an underground information model specification. The report presents the outcomes of this workshop, experiments conducted with preliminary versions of the MUDDI model, and a draft of the conceptual MUDDI model itself, also available on Github in Enterprise Architect UML form.

 
 

Description of deliverables

These are the categories of specification deliverables. The specific titles and how they are apportioned to particular documents for publication will be determined in the course of prioritization by the SWG members.

  • The MUDDI conceptual model will describe the scope, critical concepts and main relationships that define the model.

  • The MUDDI roadmap specification will describe how extensions, interfaces, and specializations to MUDDI should be developed and provide an initial listing of expected modules.

  • At least one logical model specification will be developed that is consistent with the conceptual model and provides the basis for possibly automated generation of one or more implementation specifications.

  • At least one implementation specification will be developed to support a specific data language and encoding, such as GML, CityGML, SF-SQL, or GeoJSON.

  • (Optional) Mapping and/or extension specifications that describe how to carry out partial or complete data transformations between MUDDI and other relevant models that are proposed or in use for underground data such as BIM/IFC, IMKL, CityGML UN ADE (Utility Network Application Domain Extension), ESRI Utility Network, etc.

Initial Deliverables

  1. MUDDI Conceptual Model Specification

  2. MUDDI Roadmap and Extensibility Framework

  3. MUDDI Logical and Implementation Model Specification for GML and SF-SQL

Additional SWG Tasks

  1. Elaboration and update of underground built environment data use cases.

  2. Identification of interface features that connect underground and above-ground environments for utilities and other built infrastructure.

  3. Liaison through the IDBE Subcommittee for mapping and harmonization between relevant built environment standards published by other organizations.

IPR Policy for this SWG

[x] RAND-Royalty Free

[ ] RAND for fee

Anticipated Audience / Participants

The audience for this activity includes underground data experts but also any of the diverse stakeholders involved in the critical use cases for such data.

Other informative information about the work of this SWG

Collaboration

Liaison is expected with the OGC CityGML SWG, InfraGML SWG, GeoSciML SWG, and other SWGs and DWGs, to ensure consistency of approach to data model standardization.

Liaison is also planned with the American Society of Civil Engineers for coordination with regard to ASCE 38-02, "As-Built" specifications. The contact for this coordination is Phil Meis

Other collaborators are expected to include, beside the 3DIM DWG: the IDBE Subcommittee, the LandInfra DWG, Utilities and Energy DWG, Smart City DWG, PipelineML SWG, etc within OGC, as well as BuildingSmart International (BIM/IFC) outside of OGC.

Similar or Applicable Standards Work (OGC and Elsewhere)

Flanders has developed, implemented, and mandated the KLIP system for underground infrastructure based on the IMKL model which is in turn based on INSPIRE standards.

The UK Geospatial Commission has led a National Underground Assets Registry project using an underground asset data model based on the initial MUDDI conceptual model [2]

Singapore has been developing an underground land administration model [4] based in part on the CityGML Utility Network ADE.

Supporters of this Charter

The following people support this proposal and are committed to the Charter and projected meeting schedule. These members are known as SWG Founding or Charter members. The charter members agree to the SoW and IPR terms as defined in this charter. The charter members have voting rights beginning the day the SWG is officially formed. Charter Members are shown on the public SWG page. Extend the table as necessary.

Name

Organization

Carsten Rönsdorf

UK Ordnance Survey

Alex Ramage

Scottish Government

Geoff Zeiss

Between The Poles / OGC Board of Directors

Jan Hjelmager

Danish Agency for Data Supply & Efficiency (SDFE)

H.C. Gruler

Leica Geosystems

Rob van Son

ETH Zurich

Tatjana Kutzner

TU Munich

Alan Leidner

GISMO

Victor Khoo

Singapore Land Authority

Debra Laefer

New York University

Moufid Charafeddine

BetterGIS

Andrew Hughes

BGS

Thomas Kolbe

TU Munich

Giorgio Agugiaro

TU Delft

Byron Cochrane

OpenWork

Jingya Yan

Singapore ETH-Centre

Gabriel S. Arancibia

Public Surveyors of Canada

 

References

[1] J. Lieberman and A. ed’s Ryan, “OGC Underground Infrastructure Concept Study Engineering Report,” 2017. http://docs.opengeospatial.org/per/17-048.html

[2] J. Lieberman ed., "MUDDI Model for Underground Data Definition and Integration Engineering Report," 2019. http://docs.opengeospatial.org/per/17-090r1.html

[3] OGC API - Features - Part 1: Core https://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/ogcapi-features

[4] Yan, Jingya & Jaw, Siow Wei & Soon, Kean & Wieser, Andreas & Schrotter, Gerhard. (2019). Towards an Underground Utilities 3D Data Model for Land Administration. Remote Sensing. 11. 1957. 10.3390/rs11171957.